Skip to main content

Autism and Insurance Coverage State Laws

An update from the National Conference of State Legislatures has been posted to their webpage on insurance mandates by various states. The last change to a state law was posted in May 2011, but several changes will be taking effect in approximately a dozen states in 2012 based on these laws and language in the federal Affordable Care Act:

Autism and Insurance Coverage State Laws: A total of 33 states and the District of Columbia have laws related to autism and insurance coverage. At least 26 states—Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin—specifically require insurers to provide coverage for the treatment of autism. Other states may require limited coverage for autism under mental health coverage or other laws.
Some states have passed laws with numerous exemptions, especially for their own state-operated insurance programs meant for families in need. Ironically, the ACA itself seems to allowing states to limit coverage of autism treatments. The reason for this is that the federal government has suggested states only need to offer specific minimums. The states have decided to follow federal minimums. For example, Arkansas amended their insurance law to read:
The law specifies that on or after January 1, 2014, to the extent that these provisions require benefits that exceed the essential health benefits specified under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the benefits that exceed the essential health benefits shall not be required of a health benefit plan when the plan is offered by a health care insurer in the state through the state medical exchange.
Of course, every insurance company will find a way to participate in the exchange markets if this allows the companies to decrease coverage offerings.

Most state employee plans offer coverage that is not mandated of other insurance plans, nor is offered to those enrolled in state supported programs. For example, Iowa's law reads:
Requires state employee health care plans to provide coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of autism spectrum disorders for individuals under 21 years of age.
The diagnosis has to be made by an "appropriate" health care provider. No specific guidelines are offered in the Iowa law, nor are they offered by most states. At least two states' laws mention the "DSM" without specifying the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition, Revised. I don't know if this means coverage will expand or contract when the DSM V is published. Personally, I have no problem with laws being vague as to the diagnosis source or basis, since "autism" is an evolving diagnosis. I'd rather leave the health care issues to doctors instead of lawyers and legislators.

Read the NCSL updates and follow the links to your individual state's laws. Also, be aware that many insurance policies are set by insurance commissioners and other regulators based on the laws passed by state legislatures. This means that you should contact an insurance expert in your state if you have questions about coverage. There are too many changes between 2011 and 2014 for any person to keep up with them. Also, if court challenges to the ACA are successful, expect states and insurers to reduce various types of coverage, including autism-related insurance coverage.

Personally, I have no idea what to expect between now and 2014 in the courts or at the federal level. Follow the NCSL page, though, and you'll at least be aware of what the laws are at any moment:


  1. Thank you for writing about such an important topic. I've placed your blog in my list of autism blogs. I appreciate reading from the perspective of someone who has autism.


Post a Comment

Comments violating the policies of this blog will not be approved for posting. Language and content should be appropriate for all readers and maintain a polite tone. Thank you.

Popular posts from this blog

Autism, Asperger's, and IQ

"Aren't people with Asperger's more likely to be geniuses? Isn't genius related to autism?"

A university student asked this in a course I am teaching. The class discussion was covering neurological differences, free will, and the nature versus nurture debate. The textbook for the course includes sidebars on the brain and behavior throughout chapters on ethics and morality. This student was asking a question reflecting media portrayals of autism spectrum disorders, social skills difficulties, and genius.

I did not address this question from a personal perspective in class, but I have when speaking to groups of parents, educators, and caregivers. Some of the reasons these questions arise, as mentioned above, are media portrayals and news coverage of autism. Examples include:
Television shows with gifted characters either identified with or assumed to have autistic traits: Alphas, Big Bang Theory, Bones, Rizzoli and Isles, Touch, and others. Some would include She…

Listen… and Help Others Hear

We lack diversity in the autism community.

Think about what you see, online and in the media. I see upper-middle class parents, able to afford iPads and tutors and official diagnoses. I see parents who have the resources to fight for IEPs and physical accommodations.

I see self-advocacy leadership that has been fortunate (and hard working, certainly) to attend universities, travel the nation (or even internationally), and have forums that reach thousands.

What I don't see? Most of our actual community. The real community that represents autism's downsides. The marginalized communities, ignored and excluded from our boards, our commissions, our business networks.

How did my lower-income parents, without college educations, give me a chance to be more? How did they fight the odds? They did, and now I am in a position of privilege. But I don't seem to be making much of a difference.

Demand that your charities seek out the broadest possible array of advisers and board members.…

Life Updates: The MFA Sprint

Life is okay, if more than a little hectic at the end of this first month.

With one month down, I'm 11 months away from my MFA in Film and Digital Technology. Though things might happen and things do go wrong, so far I'm on schedule and things are going well —— though I'm exhausted and working harder than I did for any other degree. Because the MFA requires projects every week, this isn't as easy to schedule as writing. Even researching a paper can be done from the comfort of home, at any hour.

You cannot make movies by yourself, at any time of day. It doesn't work that way. Filming takes time, and often requires a team of people. It's not comparable to working alone on a degree in writing or rhetoric.

The team-based nature of film is exhausting for me, but I enjoy the results. I also like the practical nature of the skills being taught. You either learn how to adjust ISO, f/Stop, shutter speed, and other variables or you don't. You can have theories …