Skip to main content

Autism and "Fitting in" with Peers

A Facebook fan — and thanks to everyone following us on FB and Twitter — asked if I could address problems with "fitting in" with same-age peers. A good topic, and a difficult one.

The challenge is that there are two different "stages" I'm learning about among autistic individuals. As children, many high-functioning autistics seem to deal better with adults. As adults, the opposite seems to be the case, with autistics relating better to children. The challenges make sense, though, as I will explain.

As a child, the individual with Asperger's or any "high-functioning" ASD diagnosis is likely drawn to concrete thinking, pattern recognition, and might be an "expert" on a few subjects of special interest. Compared to his or her peers, the autistic seems "advanced" because some skills we associate with greater chronological ages appear early. These are not social skills, however.

The interest in topics and things, compared to other children's interest in play and socializing, appears "more mature" at first. This same situation occurs among gifted children, so a "twice special" child is going to be particularly prone to this "things not people" period of development.

Other children are unlikely to care about a single topic as intensely as the autistic, while adults view the specialization as an impressive sign of intelligence. Even when a splinter skill is not a sign of innate reasoning or analytical skills, adults only notice the skill or memorization is advanced beyond that of "normal" children. The autistic finds adults will indulge a special interest, especially in a young child. Adults become the safe, supportive audience for some time.

By adolescence the special skills and concrete reasoning of many autistics no longer entertains adults. The adults have become tired of hearing about anime, Disney films, space exploration, weather data, or other narrow interests. It's also no longer possible to ignore that the special interest or splinter skill is not linked to abstraction. The advanced cognitive abilities of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation likely trails the abilities of peers.

So, the autistic once rejected by children find herself or himself alienated from many adults over the years. By the late teen or early adult years, I've witnessed many autistics seeking out children as friends. The social skills he or she lacked as a child might now be in place, years later than is "typical" for development. The autistic can now relate to children — and recognizes that adults are less and less available.

Imagine being accepted by adults until your teen years, only to feel rejected as an adult. Yet, the young children who would have rejected you as a peer become more and more approachable as you learn social skills. It is as if your social circles went "backwards" from adults to children, while everyone else moved in the opposite direction.

When asked for advice on this social alienation, I generally suggest social groups and safe social settings.

Depending on the needs of your child (or yourself) you might find groups that are dedicated to autism, ADD/ADHD, and other socially frustrating challenges. I've also found groups of "gifted" people include many members with ASD and ADHD traits. You can also join groups dedicated to a special interest, from birdwatching to trains. These groups are good because being a specialist is embraced and celebrated. Social skills are secondary to the shared interests and experiences of members in these various organizations.

I have few close friends, and I know I can seem "odd" to other people. At some point in life, you accept being different is okay.


Popular posts from this blog

Autism, Asperger's, and IQ

"Aren't people with Asperger's more likely to be geniuses? Isn't genius related to autism?"

A university student asked this in a course I am teaching. The class discussion was covering neurological differences, free will, and the nature versus nurture debate. The textbook for the course includes sidebars on the brain and behavior throughout chapters on ethics and morality. This student was asking a question reflecting media portrayals of autism spectrum disorders, social skills difficulties, and genius.

I did not address this question from a personal perspective in class, but I have when speaking to groups of parents, educators, and caregivers. Some of the reasons these questions arise, as mentioned above, are media portrayals and news coverage of autism. Examples include:
Television shows with gifted characters either identified with or assumed to have autistic traits: Alphas, Big Bang Theory, Bones, Rizzoli and Isles, Touch, and others. Some would include She…

Listen… and Help Others Hear

We lack diversity in the autism community.

Think about what you see, online and in the media. I see upper-middle class parents, able to afford iPads and tutors and official diagnoses. I see parents who have the resources to fight for IEPs and physical accommodations.

I see self-advocacy leadership that has been fortunate (and hard working, certainly) to attend universities, travel the nation (or even internationally), and have forums that reach thousands.

What I don't see? Most of our actual community. The real community that represents autism's downsides. The marginalized communities, ignored and excluded from our boards, our commissions, our business networks.

How did my lower-income parents, without college educations, give me a chance to be more? How did they fight the odds? They did, and now I am in a position of privilege. But I don't seem to be making much of a difference.

Demand that your charities seek out the broadest possible array of advisers and board members.…

Life Updates: The MFA Sprint

Life is okay, if more than a little hectic at the end of this first month.

With one month down, I'm 11 months away from my MFA in Film and Digital Technology. Though things might happen and things do go wrong, so far I'm on schedule and things are going well —— though I'm exhausted and working harder than I did for any other degree. Because the MFA requires projects every week, this isn't as easy to schedule as writing. Even researching a paper can be done from the comfort of home, at any hour.

You cannot make movies by yourself, at any time of day. It doesn't work that way. Filming takes time, and often requires a team of people. It's not comparable to working alone on a degree in writing or rhetoric.

The team-based nature of film is exhausting for me, but I enjoy the results. I also like the practical nature of the skills being taught. You either learn how to adjust ISO, f/Stop, shutter speed, and other variables or you don't. You can have theories …