Skip to main content

Am I Autistic

My doctoral dissertation included a chapter on the definitions of "autism." I located regional differences in criteria and these differences correlate to diagnostic "clusters" where the more liberal diagnostic traditions are emerging.

Some clinicians call for a broad application of "autismness" that scales from "zero autismness" to "classic autism." This would result in a lot of autism diagnoses.

Others, especially researchers, cling to the DSM-III tradition that autism cannot be comorbid with a known physical diagnosis. This was explained to me in this way: if you know the cause, you can research and treat accordingly. Things we do know to be "medical" are moved out of the DSM on a regular basis. This is a logical strategy for categorizing and treating conditions. You wouldn't study Fragile X the same way you might neurotoxin exposure.

I fall into the "if you know it, classify it" camp. If I know the cause of my condition (and I do), then I should receive medical and educational supports accordingly. "Autism" by itself would be too vague. I have a left frontal lobe incursion from a complicated delivery exacerbated by some other issues. In Minnesota, I am diagnosed with HFA ("autism"), but in California my physical injuries and their expressions were the only diagnoses.

I compare this to "cancer." The term by itself, while somewhat helpful, tells a physician little. However, if we clarify the diagnosis of cancer to the specific type, it can be appropriately studied and (hopefully) treated. "Cancer" is too broad to be medically useful, just as "autism" is often too broad to help determine specific research needed and treatment strategies.

For clarification, my specialty is language comprehension and educational strategies. My research was both on the rhetoric of autism diagnostics and how to best address the language development of students with autism; many of us struggle with the "oddities" of language.

Nothing is odder than being "autistic" in Minnesota but not in my native California. It is one reason I do doubt the label's usefulness except in the most general applications.


  1. Diagnosis is still difficult. Have you heard of the ASDS or ADOS test for autism? It's supposed to be the gold standard.

    I agree with your cancer analogy. Autism, to me, is very broad and it's hard to quantify, as in insurance codes. There are many different variables and grey areas.

    I think the insurance companies will more or less nail it down but it will take years, I'm sure.

    Doctors? Ha. They can't seem to agree among themselves.

  2. I've written about the Level 2 diagnostic instruments and their challenges:

    I dislike symptom based, observational diagnostics. I hope we do add to the current list of known causes -- though that list is short and represents a small, small percentage of diagnoses. I dislike the "We know it when we see it!" approach to labels like "autism."

  3. I am impressed with your accomplishments. That gives parents like myself so much hope. My daughter was diagnosed autistic at age 5. No way was I going to let that diagnosis stop us from helping her reach her highest potential. She worked very very hard (so did we) to get to where she is-- a senior in a performing arts high school in New York City, with college in her future. I share some of what we did for her on my blog:

  4. My thesis will also contain such a chapter, it's very important to make sense of the whole thing to establish that autism is not such a certain or a rigid category as some would have it.

    There is a lot more material around now to cite, and more coming out all the time as autism is now coming under more of a sociological and anthropological conspectus than ever before with clinicians and academics under the researchers microscope as much as we common "subjects"


Post a Comment

Comments violating the policies of this blog will not be approved for posting. Language and content should be appropriate for all readers and maintain a polite tone. Thank you.

Popular posts from this blog

Autism, Asperger's, and IQ

"Aren't people with Asperger's more likely to be geniuses? Isn't genius related to autism?"

A university student asked this in a course I am teaching. The class discussion was covering neurological differences, free will, and the nature versus nurture debate. The textbook for the course includes sidebars on the brain and behavior throughout chapters on ethics and morality. This student was asking a question reflecting media portrayals of autism spectrum disorders, social skills difficulties, and genius.

I did not address this question from a personal perspective in class, but I have when speaking to groups of parents, educators, and caregivers. Some of the reasons these questions arise, as mentioned above, are media portrayals and news coverage of autism. Examples include:
Television shows with gifted characters either identified with or assumed to have autistic traits: Alphas, Big Bang Theory, Bones, Rizzoli and Isles, Touch, and others. Some would include She…

Listen… and Help Others Hear

We lack diversity in the autism community.

Think about what you see, online and in the media. I see upper-middle class parents, able to afford iPads and tutors and official diagnoses. I see parents who have the resources to fight for IEPs and physical accommodations.

I see self-advocacy leadership that has been fortunate (and hard working, certainly) to attend universities, travel the nation (or even internationally), and have forums that reach thousands.

What I don't see? Most of our actual community. The real community that represents autism's downsides. The marginalized communities, ignored and excluded from our boards, our commissions, our business networks.

How did my lower-income parents, without college educations, give me a chance to be more? How did they fight the odds? They did, and now I am in a position of privilege. But I don't seem to be making much of a difference.

Demand that your charities seek out the broadest possible array of advisers and board members.…

Life Updates: The MFA Sprint

Life is okay, if more than a little hectic at the end of this first month.

With one month down, I'm 11 months away from my MFA in Film and Digital Technology. Though things might happen and things do go wrong, so far I'm on schedule and things are going well —— though I'm exhausted and working harder than I did for any other degree. Because the MFA requires projects every week, this isn't as easy to schedule as writing. Even researching a paper can be done from the comfort of home, at any hour.

You cannot make movies by yourself, at any time of day. It doesn't work that way. Filming takes time, and often requires a team of people. It's not comparable to working alone on a degree in writing or rhetoric.

The team-based nature of film is exhausting for me, but I enjoy the results. I also like the practical nature of the skills being taught. You either learn how to adjust ISO, f/Stop, shutter speed, and other variables or you don't. You can have theories …