Skip to main content

Geek? Nerd? Autistic?

Are you autistic because you're a geek? Or are you a geek because you're autistic? Would you even mention it during an internship interview?
I've been asked numerous times if my interest in technology is somehow connected to having an "autistic" brain. However, I'm reasonably certain no one had asked if technology made me autistic. Yet, the question was asked last week.

Now, I can't really argue the point too much. I'm a techie or geek or whatever you want to call me. I've loved computers since I first sat down at an Atari 800. Asking a diagnosed autistic programmer about a trend among programmers? I'm not sure I can be objective.

Seeking to clarify, the programmer asked me if there was now a somewhat nonchalant, or reckless, impulse to think of all "geeks" as autistic. He described self-diagnosed Aspergers as "trendy" among some of the young programmers he has interviewed in the last year or so.
It's as if coding turns you into an "Aspie" somehow. It seems like these kids are linking programming and autism. You can be good programmer and just be a good programmer.
Understand, he wasn't being mean and certainly isn't ignorant about autism. His point was that for some reason the "Geek Syndrome" is being mentioned by young programmers during job interviews. One even told him, "I have Aspergers, so you should hire me."

I asked if this wasn't a bit of hyperbole. I was assured it wasn't, and that the hiring committee at this company has been a bit taken aback by the situation.
We're all a little different, at least in the development side of the building. We sit in our offices and don't always realize the rest of the building has headed home. Yeah, we're different. But none of us ever thought we had a disorder.
I'm fairly certain that a greater percentage of programmers, engineers, scientists, and mathematicians do have "autistic" traits. I'm not alone in that assumption.

Here is a quote from Temple Grandin:
"Is there a connection between Asperger's and IT? We wouldn't even have any computers if we didn't have Asperger's," she declares. "All these labels -- 'geek' and 'nerd' and 'mild Asperger's' -- are all getting at the same thing. ... The Asperger's brain is interested in things rather than people, and people who are interested in things have given us the computer you're working on right now."
ComputerWorld (2 April 2008)
So, in the end, I don't know what this trend means. Maybe more of the programmer's colleagues have autistic traits than he realizes? Or maybe "Aspie" is a trendy way to describe the traits that have long made programmers different?

I can safely state that the computer itself and coding has not made me "more autistic" than anything else in life. If I didn't focus my energy on computers, I'd focus on something else.


  1. I have sod all interest in technology. I am still Aspergers.

  2. "I can safely state that the computer itself and coding has not made me "more autistic" than anything else in life. If I didn't focus my energy on computers, I'd focus on something else."

    Exactly. But it does appear that the Autistic mind often finds itself fascinated/interested in things technical. Unfortunately, self-daignosing as an Aspie has sort of become a trend, and I can see where some people may use it as a sort of "job skill" when trying to find employment in the tech field, hence, "I have Aspergers, so you should hire me."

    There are a lot of programmers & geeks who aren't Autistic, there are a lot who are. But you are born Autistic, you don't 'become Autistic.'


  3. I'm very good in programming, chess is my passion, and im addicted to browsing on the latest smartphone announcements. Oh no! does that make me an Aspergers??


Post a Comment

Comments violating the policies of this blog will not be approved for posting. Language and content should be appropriate for all readers and maintain a polite tone. Thank you.

Popular posts from this blog

Autism, Asperger's, and IQ

"Aren't people with Asperger's more likely to be geniuses? Isn't genius related to autism?"

A university student asked this in a course I am teaching. The class discussion was covering neurological differences, free will, and the nature versus nurture debate. The textbook for the course includes sidebars on the brain and behavior throughout chapters on ethics and morality. This student was asking a question reflecting media portrayals of autism spectrum disorders, social skills difficulties, and genius.

I did not address this question from a personal perspective in class, but I have when speaking to groups of parents, educators, and caregivers. Some of the reasons these questions arise, as mentioned above, are media portrayals and news coverage of autism. Examples include:
Television shows with gifted characters either identified with or assumed to have autistic traits: Alphas, Big Bang Theory, Bones, Rizzoli and Isles, Touch, and others. Some would include She…

Listen… and Help Others Hear

We lack diversity in the autism community.

Think about what you see, online and in the media. I see upper-middle class parents, able to afford iPads and tutors and official diagnoses. I see parents who have the resources to fight for IEPs and physical accommodations.

I see self-advocacy leadership that has been fortunate (and hard working, certainly) to attend universities, travel the nation (or even internationally), and have forums that reach thousands.

What I don't see? Most of our actual community. The real community that represents autism's downsides. The marginalized communities, ignored and excluded from our boards, our commissions, our business networks.

How did my lower-income parents, without college educations, give me a chance to be more? How did they fight the odds? They did, and now I am in a position of privilege. But I don't seem to be making much of a difference.

Demand that your charities seek out the broadest possible array of advisers and board members.…

Life Updates: The MFA Sprint

Life is okay, if more than a little hectic at the end of this first month.

With one month down, I'm 11 months away from my MFA in Film and Digital Technology. Though things might happen and things do go wrong, so far I'm on schedule and things are going well —— though I'm exhausted and working harder than I did for any other degree. Because the MFA requires projects every week, this isn't as easy to schedule as writing. Even researching a paper can be done from the comfort of home, at any hour.

You cannot make movies by yourself, at any time of day. It doesn't work that way. Filming takes time, and often requires a team of people. It's not comparable to working alone on a degree in writing or rhetoric.

The team-based nature of film is exhausting for me, but I enjoy the results. I also like the practical nature of the skills being taught. You either learn how to adjust ISO, f/Stop, shutter speed, and other variables or you don't. You can have theories …