Skip to main content

When to Go Corporate

I have read dozens of articles on what people with ASDs should or shouldn't do for a living.

The reality? There is no set group of "best" professions or paths for anyone, including those of us with unique dispositions. We might share some traits, but the notion that we can assume that all people with ASDs are similar professionally is incorrect.

Science and engineering workplaces can be as social, political, and emotionally draining as any other workplaces. Likewise, I have worked in creative settings that were exceptionally calm and ideal for someone like me. Knowing that a workplace is "technical" or "creative"doesn't tell you much about the working environment.

In November, I started shifting my job hunt to corporate possibilities. I had determined that a corporate job might be a better match for my personality. Maybe that won't be the case, but it was starting to seem that the educational positions were too political and ideological to be a good fit.

All organizations, including both corporations and universities, have personalities. Some are more social than others, and social is a problem for me. Any company in which social networking and cheerfulness are keys to promotions and success is not the company for me.

What people don't always realize is that many tech companies are social beehives. Yes, your skills matter, but so does your personality.

But, I found that humanities departments at universities were more social, more political, and more homogenous in several ways. You really do have to be like everyone else to stand much of a chance professionally.

I know I am not a "suit" destined for middle-management. My mind never stops working and I'm not the best at following external rules and routines. I like to establish my own routines. But, there are companies that don't care how you finish tasks, only that you do finish them on time and with excellent results. In general, I've done better in senior positions because they have some flexibility.

The reason I'm interested in corporate settings is that I don't have to be politically identical to my coworkers. I don't have to adhere to any certain beliefs in a corporate setting, short of not being anti-business. In education, I would need to locate a post that doesn't judge me on traits unrelated to teaching.

For now, I don't know if I will end up with any particular job. I had one corporate and one academic interview in December.

The only advice I can give: Going corporate is not good or bad, it is a matter of finding the right place for you as a person. The same can be said of any academic job, as well.


  1. It's that way for everyone. I can relate to what you said about doing your own thing. I'm like that too but I had done very well in an office setting.

    I worked in logistics and became really bored with number crunching but then I transferred depts. and worked in claims. I loved it. A lot less structure.

  2. The only advice I can give: Going corporate is not good or bad, it is a matter of finding the right place for you as a person. The same can be said of any academic job, as well.

    Well said!

    Your post tangentially reminded me of the old quote "The reason academic politics are so vicious is that the stakes are so small."



Post a Comment

Comments violating the policies of this blog will not be approved for posting. Language and content should be appropriate for all readers and maintain a polite tone. Thank you.

Popular posts from this blog

Autism, Asperger's, and IQ

"Aren't people with Asperger's more likely to be geniuses? Isn't genius related to autism?"

A university student asked this in a course I am teaching. The class discussion was covering neurological differences, free will, and the nature versus nurture debate. The textbook for the course includes sidebars on the brain and behavior throughout chapters on ethics and morality. This student was asking a question reflecting media portrayals of autism spectrum disorders, social skills difficulties, and genius.

I did not address this question from a personal perspective in class, but I have when speaking to groups of parents, educators, and caregivers. Some of the reasons these questions arise, as mentioned above, are media portrayals and news coverage of autism. Examples include:
Television shows with gifted characters either identified with or assumed to have autistic traits: Alphas, Big Bang Theory, Bones, Rizzoli and Isles, Touch, and others. Some would include She…

Listen… and Help Others Hear

We lack diversity in the autism community.

Think about what you see, online and in the media. I see upper-middle class parents, able to afford iPads and tutors and official diagnoses. I see parents who have the resources to fight for IEPs and physical accommodations.

I see self-advocacy leadership that has been fortunate (and hard working, certainly) to attend universities, travel the nation (or even internationally), and have forums that reach thousands.

What I don't see? Most of our actual community. The real community that represents autism's downsides. The marginalized communities, ignored and excluded from our boards, our commissions, our business networks.

How did my lower-income parents, without college educations, give me a chance to be more? How did they fight the odds? They did, and now I am in a position of privilege. But I don't seem to be making much of a difference.

Demand that your charities seek out the broadest possible array of advisers and board members.…

Life Updates: The MFA Sprint

Life is okay, if more than a little hectic at the end of this first month.

With one month down, I'm 11 months away from my MFA in Film and Digital Technology. Though things might happen and things do go wrong, so far I'm on schedule and things are going well —— though I'm exhausted and working harder than I did for any other degree. Because the MFA requires projects every week, this isn't as easy to schedule as writing. Even researching a paper can be done from the comfort of home, at any hour.

You cannot make movies by yourself, at any time of day. It doesn't work that way. Filming takes time, and often requires a team of people. It's not comparable to working alone on a degree in writing or rhetoric.

The team-based nature of film is exhausting for me, but I enjoy the results. I also like the practical nature of the skills being taught. You either learn how to adjust ISO, f/Stop, shutter speed, and other variables or you don't. You can have theories …