Skip to main content

More on Bullying

On Facebook, a reader asked if I have any suggestions to stop bullying. I began to consider my experiences as an educator and university scholar. I'm not sure my experiences point to any solutions, but I can relate what I have learned. (Be sure to follow The Autistic Me on Facebook!)

Evolutionary psychologists will tell you that most species engage in "battle" to establish leadership. I'm not sure how humans can overcome millions of years of "alpha-beta" sorting impulses. However, that doesn't mean that teachers, parents, mentors, and, later in life, good supervisors, cannot intercede and stop competition from crossing the line into bullying.

I was never a good athlete, even though I like some sports. I'm certainly not strong, fast, muscular, tall, or whatever else might translate into a physically dominant appearance. However, I was also rarely the smallest person in a class — average describes me well. Yes, physical presence matters. We know from research that taller people earn more money. Men with deeper voices earn more money and attract more followers, too. Why is that? Because size and depth of voice indicate higher levels of testosterone. Evolutionarily, that's an advantage to the species, at least before the technology age.

One study I've read found that the people with the most "evolutionarily favored" traits are not the most likely to be bullies. This is logical because the biggest, strongest, fastest, et cetera, has nothing to prove — up to a point. As long as the person is "better" but not a "freak" (a magnitude taller, larger, etc.) he or she is dominant. One of the nicest, kindest, most compassionate people I know is a massive body builder who went into medicine. Of course no one ever bothered him! Never being challenged, he was always treated politely and in turn learned to treat others that way.

The "mean girls" and "bullies" tend to be a step or two below the physically ideal people. Again, this is logical considered in psychological terms. When you are close to the top, but not quite there, you want to maintain that social rank. Sadly, the near-top levels of a social group tend to be the nastiest, most competitive levels.

Bullying starts when weakness is perceived. And when are weaknesses revealed? In class and on the playground. Students home in on moments of public weakness. In a classroom, these include stuttering, reading slowly, and other academic indicators students will highlight. Being outside the "norm" (at either extreme) is challenged because children and adults are naturally "tribal" socially. Daily life reveals weaknesses, and there is no way to disguise our differences.

We have to tell teachers that students will compete, but that's not the same as bullying. Who can jump rope longest? Who can throw the farthest? Who can draw the best? When the competition turns to abuse, it has to stop immediately. We need to teach "good sportsmanship" in all fields.

The irony is that even academia, the supposed epitome of intellect and progress, is competitive and cruel. The "publish or perish" competition leads to snarky comments, outright insults, and much worse among professors. "Friendly" competition soon gives way to the very things we claim to be researching ways to improve in education. I've known academic bullies, and they have made my life miserable.

There are intellectual bullies, in this modern age. Yes, there are bullies in the sciences, engineering, and even competitive chess. There are bullies in the workplace, including schools. I'm not sure we can do anything to end bullying — but we might be able to reduce it.

What good is being "number one" if no one likes you? Sportsmanship, lacking a better word, is something we should be teaching and practicing.


Popular posts from this blog

Autism, Asperger's, and IQ

"Aren't people with Asperger's more likely to be geniuses? Isn't genius related to autism?"

A university student asked this in a course I am teaching. The class discussion was covering neurological differences, free will, and the nature versus nurture debate. The textbook for the course includes sidebars on the brain and behavior throughout chapters on ethics and morality. This student was asking a question reflecting media portrayals of autism spectrum disorders, social skills difficulties, and genius.

I did not address this question from a personal perspective in class, but I have when speaking to groups of parents, educators, and caregivers. Some of the reasons these questions arise, as mentioned above, are media portrayals and news coverage of autism. Examples include:
Television shows with gifted characters either identified with or assumed to have autistic traits: Alphas, Big Bang Theory, Bones, Rizzoli and Isles, Touch, and others. Some would include She…

Listen… and Help Others Hear

We lack diversity in the autism community.

Think about what you see, online and in the media. I see upper-middle class parents, able to afford iPads and tutors and official diagnoses. I see parents who have the resources to fight for IEPs and physical accommodations.

I see self-advocacy leadership that has been fortunate (and hard working, certainly) to attend universities, travel the nation (or even internationally), and have forums that reach thousands.

What I don't see? Most of our actual community. The real community that represents autism's downsides. The marginalized communities, ignored and excluded from our boards, our commissions, our business networks.

How did my lower-income parents, without college educations, give me a chance to be more? How did they fight the odds? They did, and now I am in a position of privilege. But I don't seem to be making much of a difference.

Demand that your charities seek out the broadest possible array of advisers and board members.…

Life Updates: The MFA Sprint

Life is okay, if more than a little hectic at the end of this first month.

With one month down, I'm 11 months away from my MFA in Film and Digital Technology. Though things might happen and things do go wrong, so far I'm on schedule and things are going well —— though I'm exhausted and working harder than I did for any other degree. Because the MFA requires projects every week, this isn't as easy to schedule as writing. Even researching a paper can be done from the comfort of home, at any hour.

You cannot make movies by yourself, at any time of day. It doesn't work that way. Filming takes time, and often requires a team of people. It's not comparable to working alone on a degree in writing or rhetoric.

The team-based nature of film is exhausting for me, but I enjoy the results. I also like the practical nature of the skills being taught. You either learn how to adjust ISO, f/Stop, shutter speed, and other variables or you don't. You can have theories …